Talk:Zocky

Neutrility Template

Why did you add the Neutrality template?

...Because the second of two sentences is biased.

Esteban Rasta Lion Delgado 18:20, 4 October 2008 (PDT)

The neutrality of the Zockyism page has absolutely no relation or determining factor on the neutrality of this page. It's out of the equation completely. This is not Zocky's personal page, his personal page is User:Zocky. This is a wiki page which can be edited by anyone. Wiki pages are to remain unbiased.

Neutral point of view is a fundamental Wikimedia principle and a cornerstone of Wikipedia. All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. This is non-negotiable and expected of all articles, and of all article editors.

– Wikipedia

Please revise the second sentence of this two sentence article into one with a neutral point of view that displays facts, not opinions, then there will be no purpose for the neutrality template. It's as simple as that, don't try to make it personal and fight about it with stark bias because you're his Croatian friend.

And on a second note, go ahead and place the neutrality template on the Zockyism page and highlight exact quotes from the article that are biased. Then I will try to explain it or revise it if need be.

Esteban Rasta Lion Delgado 19:55, 6 October 2008 (PDT)

I removed the part about helping the economy. Is it okay now?Pierric Bross 14:14, 7 October 2008 (PDT)

Perfect, Bross. There can always be "controversy" sections added to articles if need be.

Esteban Rasta Lion Delgado 16:28, 7 October 2008 (PDT)