User talk:AstroRANGER
Repeated Vandalism (by astroRANGER)
Last week, I posted a very long and well-thought-out complaint that seems to have been lost without the slightest sign of the matter being seriously taken into consideration. Or even taken into consideration at all. Thus, here it is again...
User Aryamehr has been repeatedly attaching deletion templates to Pakistani-related articles without a sufficient explanation as to why, and repeatedly attaching the same template after its removal for a total of four times, the majority of the times being hidden under the description of a minor edit, with much blatant abuse.
In addition, user Aryamehr has been repeatedly making deletions off of articles without discussing it on the proper discussion page, still targeting Pakistani-related pieces and blatantly ignoring templates put into place.
Ultimately, user Aryamehr has taken the liberty to edit at will in very dishonest and petty manner, repeatedly acting unilaterally to mold the Wiki on a basis entirely in reaction to the nation of Pakistan. Could you please put an end to this?
Related links:
- http://wiki.erepublik.com/index.php?title=God_Emperor&curid=1390&action=history (deleted since then)
In addition, user Aryamehr has taken repeated edits against the three edit rule and against an 'Editing War' template in another Pakistan-related article.
Related link:
Thank you. --astroRANGER 
16:54, 26 September 2008 (PDT)
- We consider that Aryamehr did not break any rules in this case. --Admin 00:45, 7 October 2008 (PDT)
- This is ridiculous. A user edits the image of a national flag a few times and ends up with a ban. Another user edits entire articles in order to antagonize specific users and receives nothing.
- This, in combination with ignoring your users, results in a very poor perception of moderation. Coupled with the inadequacy of the administration belies the notion that this game is being extremely poorly run. Not the best way to acquire customer satisfaction, let alone customer loyalty.--astroRANGER
13:31, 8 October 2008 (PDT)
- This, in combination with ignoring your users, results in a very poor perception of moderation. Coupled with the inadequacy of the administration belies the notion that this game is being extremely poorly run. Not the best way to acquire customer satisfaction, let alone customer loyalty.--astroRANGER
