Partido Belico Nacionalista
| Languages: |  |
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Partido Bélico Nacionalista (Bellicist nationalistic party, in English) was a 
Mexican political party created at the end of 2009 by Arezh, from the ashes of Partido Verde.
Ideology
| “ In the first instance, the PBN is a socio-capitalist party. What does this mean? In itself, socio-capitalism does not officially exist as such in real life, either you are a capitalist or you are a communist, but socio-capitalism seeks a communion between two opposites, that is, a political economic center, as marked in its description.
In the description it is also stated that the PBN has an authoritarian social inclination, this is not totally true, but it is the closest thing to what we think is the most convenient. The party is not against either communism or capitalism, since being a combination of both, we can ally ourselves with other parties, whether on the left or right, without transgressing our ideology. Capitalism is a system of free circulation, the government intervenes as little as possible and in general the company comes before the worker. In many cases, it is an unfair system in which the "proletariat" is exploited and money rules. Not everyone has the same opportunities, so there will always be inequality. All "capitalist" countries have socialist tendencies, complete capitalism or neoliberalism is almost impossible, since if there were no regulation by the state everything would end up collapsing (as happened in the 2008 crisis in the USA and in which the government had to intervene). The government will always have to intervene in economic regulations so that everything can take its course, in addition, the state will always have to provide certain basic free services, such as public education. No "capitalist" country is completely so. In the case of socialism or communism, the opposite happens, the state regulates everything, private property and social classes are emancipated in search of total equality. Communism has many variants, but we will talk about it in general, we are not looking for communism since we consider that total equality cannot be achieved, since we all have different capacities and abilities, do you consider it fair to pay the same to a doctor who had to study his career for 10 years than a janitor? In the case of capitalism, the janitor would not have had the opportunity to study since he would not have been able to pay for his university studies, but in communism he would, since education should be free, so things change there. Also, the act of removing private property is something very demoralizing for anyone, human thought is based on a possessive tendency, we always make everything around us our own just by saying: “my house” “my place” “my country” "my friends" etc. Imagine that one day the government came and took away your house, your car, and all your possessions and then sent you to live in an apartment with people you don't know, they gave you clothes you don't like, and you had to share everything with everyone. Would you feel good? Would you feel comfortable? It is if communism distributes all material property, so everything is the government, and since there is no private property there is no real incentive to work, since there is always a fixed salary there will be no opportunity for any progress, so people would not work for themselves, then they would only work to work, they would do it mediocrely, even badly, companies end up working in the red and a clear example of these are state-owned companies like the Mexican ones. Really, would you work hard knowing that you will always be paid the same no matter how you work? The only thing that changes is the comfort with which you work, that would be the only incentive, always. In general, communist states end up being corrupted since humans are not psychologically made to live like this, but communism also has many benefits. And that is why we decided to make the best of both systems to create one in which everyone can live free, with good incentives to work and private property but with the same opportunities and protection for workers, in order to reduce the gap between classes. Although in the New world many of these things are not really applicable, we consider that socio-capitalism is the best option to govern Mexico. Why warlike? In real life, war will always be something aberrant, no matter what ideals it rises to, there will never be a winner or a "good and bad" as well as: "Fighting for peace is the same as fucking for virginity". There will always be implicit interests. But that is not the case in the New world, here the war is perhaps the most fun aspect of the game, since you practically cannot die and also the war promotes the economy and the increase of the population. Mexico has always been a very conservative country when it comes to unsheathing the sword, so our goals for this one may not be to become a world power, since that is an unrealizable dream... ” | |
| (Arezh)
|
History
PBN was previously known for being Partido Verde (PV), which was one of the most important Mexican parties until some Polish people aimed to take control of Mexico. Out of it, the party get stained, a serious hit from which they were unable to recover from, causing a state of inactivity for many months until, on December 16, 2009, or day 757 of the New World, it got taken by Arezh, which changed the name and refunded the actual party.
Symbology
The party logo has 3 main elements on it, with their own meaning:
- The figure similar to a S in the center of it, it's really a snake, an important symbol for Mayas and Aztecs.
- The 4 stars symbolize the cardinal points (among other things) and are accustomed to a certain form which resembles another symbol.
- The ornaments at the sides are tree branches.
