Talk:Quicksilver
do NOT edit pls --Sanya18 22:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Last section
What is that? --Belea2008 11:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
What is your problem with the 'neutrality of this article'? The last part about my banning is exactly as it happened.--Quicksilver 08:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- If you don't answer, I will delete that notice from my page.--Quicksilver 16:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I believe it's because of lines like "...and banned many times as a user on made-up excuses. Admins decided to persecute her - - - as admins considered themselves to be perfect, and were not willing to communicate on any channels." Maybe you should find another, perhaps a more neutral way to bring up that you (or "Quicksilver" as we're talking about an article that's written in 3rd person) were mistreated and that you(/she) disagree(s) with the decision to ban this mentioned citizen account. You could also provide sources and references, I remember reading some of your articles about this. You can contact Belea on his talk page if you want to hear his opinion. --
Kuhaa|sTalk tome! 16:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)- It is still the truth. I will not say it in a way so he will like it. Truth is neutral, no matter whether he likes or not. Sources? This is the truth: http://erephun.blogspot.com/2009/12/it-is-end.html As for not answering, well, I cannot prove it, as it is impossible to prove something that did not happen. I wrote dozens of e-mails to admins and none were answered. --Quicksilver 19:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Truth is neutral but that section certainly isn't. You cannot say you were "persecuted" or "banned on made-up excuses because admins considered themselves to be perfect" because those are not facts, it's just how you feel. You're basically saying that you didn't deserve any of those bans and the admins simply banned you because they didn't like you anymore. Or something like that, I don't know what really happened between you and the admins and to be honest I don't really even care. I don't have an opinion whether you deserved your bans or not, but that section doesn't meet the Wiki standards and it won't get you unbanned. There's a significant difference between what you can write in your newspaper and in your citizen page. No one owns a page here so please keep your personal grudge outside Wiki, we do also have rules here.-- Kuhaa|sTalk
tome! 11:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Truth is neutral but that section certainly isn't. You cannot say you were "persecuted" or "banned on made-up excuses because admins considered themselves to be perfect" because those are not facts, it's just how you feel. You're basically saying that you didn't deserve any of those bans and the admins simply banned you because they didn't like you anymore. Or something like that, I don't know what really happened between you and the admins and to be honest I don't really even care. I don't have an opinion whether you deserved your bans or not, but that section doesn't meet the Wiki standards and it won't get you unbanned. There's a significant difference between what you can write in your newspaper and in your citizen page. No one owns a page here so please keep your personal grudge outside Wiki, we do also have rules here.--
- It is still the truth. I will not say it in a way so he will like it. Truth is neutral, no matter whether he likes or not. Sources? This is the truth: http://erephun.blogspot.com/2009/12/it-is-end.html As for not answering, well, I cannot prove it, as it is impossible to prove something that did not happen. I wrote dozens of e-mails to admins and none were answered. --Quicksilver 19:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I believe it's because of lines like "...and banned many times as a user on made-up excuses. Admins decided to persecute her - - - as admins considered themselves to be perfect, and were not willing to communicate on any channels." Maybe you should find another, perhaps a more neutral way to bring up that you (or "Quicksilver" as we're talking about an article that's written in 3rd person) were mistreated and that you(/she) disagree(s) with the decision to ban this mentioned citizen account. You could also provide sources and references, I remember reading some of your articles about this. You can contact Belea on his talk page if you want to hear his opinion. --
So, what you are saying that I cannot write the truth in the Wiki? That you do not care about truth, just that the Wiki is nice and soft (and contain lies) as admins like it? Your rules say that on the wiki page one must lie if admins want it?
I have rewritten the page to include the proofs. Now, nobody can question the neutrality of it. --Quicksilver 13:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Dispute resolved, I am deleting the notice from the page.--Quicksilver 20:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
