Talk:USWP scandal

This article is biast, can we flag it up please? If there is a "USWP Scandal" page, it should properly show both sides, this article fails to do so. Plus, grammar... There is much disputed information here. - Makowski

Flag it then! --Geo "Talk Pages" Belea 17:54, 26 December 2008 (EET)

Use {{Neutrality}} --Mini "Template boy" Bill have a biscuit 17:54, 26 December 2008 (EET)

Added. --Geo "Talk Pages" Belea 18:37, 26 December 2008 (EET)

(I wanted Makowski to add it :) Otherwise I could have done it myself) --Mini "Template boy" Bill have a biscuit 18:40, 26 December 2008 (EET)

Good point! I'll keep that in mind next time... --Geo "Talk Pages" Belea 18:44, 26 December 2008 (EET)

Thanks - Makowski

I found the grammar atrocious and rewrote it, and tried to make it more neutral, if I can get an approval, I'd like to remove the neutrality tag, and maybe the stub tag, too. --John Wycliffe

It still needs more work on the clarity... a lot chopped up sentences. I am taking neutrality off but will leave the stub on until it reads a bit more clearly. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 22:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)