Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rules Addendum"

Revision as of 03:02, 19 November 2014

I suggest that the laws should be updated to reflect the new policy from admins. The sections that are affected: http://wiki.erepublik.com/index.php/Rules_Addendum

"Insults" "There is a distinction between disagreements and insults. Ironic content and propaganda will not be considered as an attempt to insult other citizens. "

This should be modified that disagreement with and/or criticism of admins' new rules about gameplay constitutes as insult. After all my org was permanently banned for such criticism so it must have changed sometime.

"Spam"

A new part should be added that states that PM-s have an upper limit (even different ones) that may be sent to one person, otherwise it also carries a permanent ban. This limit must be stated, for I have tried to ask, but got no answer. My other org was perm banned straight away for a dozen or so PM-s to an admin so that must be a horrible sin now.

"Illegal public debate'

It should be stated that anything can be an illegal public debate that an admin feels it so, regardless of its actual content.

"Appeal"

There are of course no rules governing appeals, but it must be stated that they are practically useless as the same admin decides it who gives the permanent ban a few minutes earlier.--Quicksilver 11:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Update regarding Endorsement feature 18.11.2014/Day 2555

Edit pls, I don't have the proper rights:

• "move lottery / betting articles;" below the "promotion" one and edit it: "lottery / betting articles (see an exception below);
• add another point at the top of "ARE NOT considered" thingie:
• "lottery / betting articles made by using the article's Endorsement feature (notice that the eRepublik staff will not offer help with potential cheating/scams made by the author);"

-- elbandido 02:02, 19 November 2014 (PST)