Difference between revisions of "Nomos Laboratories"
From eRepublik Official Wiki
(grammar, linking, styling) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
logo= Nomos Laboratories.jpg| | logo= Nomos Laboratories.jpg| | ||
website= | <!-- Website url, NOT the erepublik url --> | website= | <!-- Website url, NOT the erepublik url --> | ||
− | number= 1608417| | + | number= 1608417| |
song= | | song= | | ||
− | country=USA | | + | country= USA| |
− | headquarters=New Jersey | | + | headquarters= [[New Jersey]]| |
− | owner=Phoenix Quinn | | + | owner= Silas_Soule{{!}}Phoenix Quinn| |
− | + | ||
sub= | <!--(subsidiaries)--> | sub= | <!--(subsidiaries)--> | ||
− | founded=4-July-2009 | | + | founded= 4-July-2009| |
− | founder=Phoenix Quinn | | + | founder= Silas_Soule{{!}}Phoenix Quinn| |
− | + | ||
industry= | <!--(these two rows)*--> | industry= | <!--(these two rows)*--> | ||
industries= | <!--(are mutually exclusive, use Construction, Manufacturing, or Raw Materials)--> | industries= | <!--(are mutually exclusive, use Construction, Manufacturing, or Raw Materials)--> | ||
products= | <!--(use house, weapons, gifts, hospital, iron, etc.) --> | products= | <!--(use house, weapons, gifts, hospital, iron, etc.) --> | ||
services=research | | services=research | | ||
− | colours= | | + | colours= | |
− | }} | + | newspaper= {{eLink|newspaper|191684|Curious Clockworks}}| |
− | + | }} | |
− | + | '''Nomos Laboratories''' was an [[organization]] in the {{CountryLink|USA}} that was publishing analysis of the different aspects of life in the [[New World]]. | |
− | + | {{TOCright}} | |
==Patterns of Colonialism in eRepublik== | ==Patterns of Colonialism in eRepublik== | ||
− | |||
;Sources: | ;Sources: | ||
* [http://www.ereptools.pl/regions ErepTools - Erepublik regions] | * [http://www.ereptools.pl/regions ErepTools - Erepublik regions] | ||
Line 35: | Line 32: | ||
# Four Countries are wholly occupied: Belgium, Moldavia, South Africa, and South Korea. | # Four Countries are wholly occupied: Belgium, Moldavia, South Africa, and South Korea. | ||
− | # Of Countries not wholly occupied, the most heavily colonized are | + | # Of Countries not wholly occupied, the most heavily colonized are China, India and Greece. |
− | # In terms of number of regions occupied, the most successful Colonialists are: | + | # In terms of the number of regions occupied, the most successful Colonialists are: |
## Indonesia, which has almost twice as many colonies as anyone else | ## Indonesia, which has almost twice as many colonies as anyone else | ||
## Iran | ## Iran | ||
Line 46: | Line 43: | ||
;Conjectures | ;Conjectures | ||
− | + | There are two main patterns of colonialism in eRepublik: | |
− | + | # Imperialist: colonizing with the aim of gaining resources and "winning" the game in a military sense | |
− | * Examples: Indonesia, Iran, Hungary | + | #* Examples: Indonesia, Iran, Hungary |
− | + | # Cultural/Self-Defense: colonizing with the aim of modelling the "real life" cultural similarities, historical/revanchist aspirations, or to create a federated country that is stronger than its separate parts | |
− | * Examples: Japan, Netherlands, Romania, Turkey | + | #* Examples: Japan, Netherlands, Romania, Turkey |
;Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry | ;Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry | ||
− | + | * A possible third category might be "temporary colonialism by agreement". Events will likely determine if this is a real pattern, or if such agreements are actually cover for Imperial-style aggression. | |
− | * Examples: Hungarian occupation of Scotland; Indonesian occupation of Kyushu | + | ** Examples: Hungarian occupation of Scotland; Indonesian occupation of Kyushu |
− | + | * Thanks! to {{eLink|citizen|1550283|comandantedavid}}, who noted that knowing these patterns over time, such as who are the most imperialist nations in eRep history, would be quite interesting. | |
;Data | ;Data | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | |+ Countries With the Most Occupied Regions | + | |+ Countries With the Most Occupied Regions as of Day 601 (13 July 2009) |
|- | |- | ||
− | ! Country !! Number of | + | ! Country !! Number of Regions Occupied |
|- | |- | ||
| China || 11 | | China || 11 | ||
Line 101: | Line 98: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
− | |+ Most Colonialist Countries | + | |+ Most Colonialist Countries as of Day 601 (13 July 2009) |
|- | |- | ||
! Country !! Number of Foreign Regions Occupied | ! Country !! Number of Foreign Regions Occupied | ||
Line 132: | Line 129: | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | {| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | ||
− | |+All Occupied Regions of the World | + | |+All Occupied Regions of the World as of Day 601 (13 July 2009) |
|- | |- | ||
! Country !! Region !! Occupier !! Notes | ! Country !! Region !! Occupier !! Notes | ||
Line 148: | Line 145: | ||
| Austria || Tyrol || Italy || Population < 10 | | Austria || Tyrol || Italy || Population < 10 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Belgium || Brussels-Capital Region || Netherlands || All | + | | Belgium || Brussels-Capital Region || Netherlands || All Belgium is occupied by the Netherlands |
|- | |- | ||
| Belgium || Flemish Region || Netherlands || | | Belgium || Flemish Region || Netherlands || | ||
Line 236: | Line 233: | ||
| Russia || West Siberian Region || Indonesia || Q5 Defense, High Iron, High Oil, High Wood | | Russia || West Siberian Region || Indonesia || Q5 Defense, High Iron, High Oil, High Wood | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | South Africa || Eastern Cape || Indonesia || All South Africa is | + | | South Africa || Eastern Cape || Indonesia || All South Africa is occupied |
|- | |- | ||
| South Africa || Free State || Brazil || | | South Africa || Free State || Brazil || | ||
Line 254: | Line 251: | ||
| South Africa || Western Cape || Indonesia || | | South Africa || Western Cape || Indonesia || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | South Korea || Chuncheongbuk-do || Japan || All South Korea is occupied by Japan | + | | South Korea || Chuncheongbuk-do || Japan || All of the South Korea is occupied by Japan |
|- | |- | ||
| South Korea || Chungcheongnam-do || Japan || | | South Korea || Chungcheongnam-do || Japan || | ||
Line 287: | Line 284: | ||
* eUSA wiki page; USA Region pages, USA Election pages, Citizen, Region and Party pages from eRep; Forum postings | * eUSA wiki page; USA Region pages, USA Election pages, Citizen, Region and Party pages from eRep; Forum postings | ||
;Description: | ;Description: | ||
− | * Graphs and charts show relative strength of US political parties and voting patterns | + | * Graphs and charts show the relative strength of US political parties and voting patterns |
;Observations | ;Observations | ||
# About 1 in 5 citizens voted in the last Congressional election. | # About 1 in 5 citizens voted in the last Congressional election. | ||
# Not all Party members voted in the last Congressional election. The number of total votes cast (3,240) was less than the total number of Party members (5,587). | # Not all Party members voted in the last Congressional election. The number of total votes cast (3,240) was less than the total number of Party members (5,587). | ||
− | # | + | # {{Plain link|url=//docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcd6cv9v_25pg2jr8dd eUSA Constitution}}, Article 5 says (emphasis added): "Citizens of the United States of America are allowed to join any of the country's <strong>five largest political parties</strong> to run for Congress provided that they are level 12 or higher." |
# The same Constitution also enshrines "the freedom to bare arms", though it says nothing about either the freedom to bare legs or the freedom to arm bears. :-) | # The same Constitution also enshrines "the freedom to bare arms", though it says nothing about either the freedom to bare legs or the freedom to arm bears. :-) | ||
;Conjectures | ;Conjectures | ||
− | # On the basis of stated political Orientations, there are two major and two minor blocs of political sentiment in | + | # On the basis of stated political Orientations, there are two major and two minor blocs of political sentiment in the USA: |
## '''Major blocs''': Center-Left and Center-Right | ## '''Major blocs''': Center-Left and Center-Right | ||
## '''Minor blocs''': Far-Left and Center | ## '''Minor blocs''': Far-Left and Center | ||
Line 301: | Line 298: | ||
# The Far-Left and Center-Right blocs were somewhat under-represented in this Congress as compared to the actual size of their party memberships. | # The Far-Left and Center-Right blocs were somewhat under-represented in this Congress as compared to the actual size of their party memberships. | ||
;Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry | ;Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry | ||
− | Thanks! to [[Robert Bayer]] ( | + | Thanks! to [[Robert Bayer]] ({{eLink|citizen|1294983|eRep page}}), who observed that: |
− | # Wiki page [[ | + | # Wiki page [[Congress of the USA 2009]] has some of the same info, with additional types of analysis and graphs. |
# Classifying parties on the left-right spectrum is likely not the most accurate way to distinguish them. | # Classifying parties on the left-right spectrum is likely not the most accurate way to distinguish them. | ||
And also for suggesting that: | And also for suggesting that: | ||
− | + | * It would be useful to compile data on which parties have the most members where. | |
;Data: Party/Non-Party; Voters/Non-Voters | ;Data: Party/Non-Party; Voters/Non-Voters | ||
Line 320: | Line 317: | ||
|+Congressional Representation by Party | |+Congressional Representation by Party | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ! Orient. !! | + | ! Orient. !! Abbr. !! Name !! Party Members !! Congress Members !! Congress Share !! Share of Citizens in Party !! Share of All Party Members |
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="red" | Far-Left || SFP || Socialist Freedom Party || 94 || 1 || 2.0% || 0.6% || 1.7% | | bgcolor="red" | Far-Left || SFP || Socialist Freedom Party || 94 || 1 || 2.0% || 0.6% || 1.7% |
Revision as of 00:19, 16 August 2022
This page has been saved as historical information.
|
Nomos Laboratories
|
Nomos Laboratories was an organization in the USA that was publishing analysis of the different aspects of life in the New World.
Patterns of Colonialism in eRepublik
- Sources
- Description
- Charts show patterns of regional occupation in eRepublik
- Observations
- Four Countries are wholly occupied: Belgium, Moldavia, South Africa, and South Korea.
- Of Countries not wholly occupied, the most heavily colonized are China, India and Greece.
- In terms of the number of regions occupied, the most successful Colonialists are:
- Indonesia, which has almost twice as many colonies as anyone else
- Iran
- Japan, which claims to be "protecting" South Korea and therefore not colonialist (disputed)
- Hungary
- Turkey, all of whose colonies are in Greece
- Brazil
- Conjectures
There are two main patterns of colonialism in eRepublik:
- Imperialist: colonizing with the aim of gaining resources and "winning" the game in a military sense
- Examples: Indonesia, Iran, Hungary
- Cultural/Self-Defense: colonizing with the aim of modelling the "real life" cultural similarities, historical/revanchist aspirations, or to create a federated country that is stronger than its separate parts
- Examples: Japan, Netherlands, Romania, Turkey
- Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry
- A possible third category might be "temporary colonialism by agreement". Events will likely determine if this is a real pattern, or if such agreements are actually cover for Imperial-style aggression.
- Examples: Hungarian occupation of Scotland; Indonesian occupation of Kyushu
- Thanks! to comandantedavid, who noted that knowing these patterns over time, such as who are the most imperialist nations in eRep history, would be quite interesting.
- Data
Country | Number of Regions Occupied |
---|---|
China | 11 |
South Africa | 9 (all) |
South Korea | 9 (all) |
India | 7 |
Greece | 6 |
Austria | 4 |
Moldavia | 4 (all) |
Pakistan | 4 |
Belgium | 3 (all) |
Denmark | 3 |
Russia | 3 |
Australia | 2 |
Germany | 2 |
Ukraine | 2 |
Japan | 1 |
Switzerland | 1 |
Country | Number of Foreign Regions Occupied |
---|---|
Indonesia | 19 |
Iran | 10 |
Japan | 9 |
Hungary | 8 |
Turkey | 6 |
Brazil | 5 |
Italy | 4 |
Romania | 4 |
Netherlands | 3 |
Germany | 2 |
India | 1 |
Slovenia | 1 |
Country | Region | Occupier | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | South Australia | Indonesia | High Grain |
Australia | Western Australia | Indonesia | Q5 Defense, High Grain, High Diamonds |
Austria | Burgenland | Hungary | |
Austria | Carinthia | Slovenia | Population < 10 |
Austria | Salzburg | Italy | Population < 10 |
Austria | Tyrol | Italy | Population < 10 |
Belgium | Brussels-Capital Region | Netherlands | All Belgium is occupied by the Netherlands |
Belgium | Flemish Region | Netherlands | |
Belgium | Walloon Region | Netherlands | |
China | Fujian | Indonesia | |
China | Guandong | Indonesia | |
China | Guangxi | Indonesia | Population < 10 |
China | Heilongjiang | Iran | High Iron |
China | Jilin | Iran | Population < 10 |
China | Liaoning | Iran | Q5 Defense, High Iron |
China | Qinghai | Indonesia | Population < 10 |
China | Shaanxi | Indonesia | |
China | Shanxi | Indonesia | Population < 10 |
China | Xinjiang | Indonesia | Q5 Defense |
China | Zhejiang | Indonesia | |
Denmark | Midtyjlland | Germany | |
Denmark | Nordylland | Hungary | |
Denmark | Syddanmark | Germany | |
Germany | Bavaria | Italy | High Grain |
Germany | Hesse | Hungary | |
Greece | Aegean Island | Turkey | |
Greece | Aegean Region | Turkey | |
Greece | Epirus | Turkey | |
Greece | Ionian Island | Turkey | |
Greece | Peloponnese | Turkey | |
Greece | Thessaly | Turkey | |
India | Bihar | Iran | |
India | Jharkand | Iran | Q5 Defense, High Wood |
India | Karnataka | Indonesia | Q5 Defense, High Iron |
India | Madhya Pradesh | Indonesia | High Grain |
India | North India | Iran | High Grain |
India | Uttar Pradesh | Iran | High Grain |
India | West Bengal | Iran | |
Japan | Kyushu | Indonesia | High Grain, supposedly region is on loan |
Moldavia | Chisinau | Romania | All of Moldavia is occupied by Romania |
Moldavia | Northern Basarabia | Romania | |
Moldavia | Sourthern Bararabia | Romania | Population < 10 |
Moldavia | Transnistria | Romania | |
Pakistan | Balochistan | Iran | |
Pakistan | Jammu and Kashmir | India | |
Pakistan | North-West Frontier Province | Iran | |
Pakistan | Sindh | Indonesia | Population < 10 |
Russia | North Caucasus Region | Hungary | Q5 Defense, High Oil |
Russia | Urals Region | Hungary | Q5 Defense, High Iron |
Russia | West Siberian Region | Indonesia | Q5 Defense, High Iron, High Oil, High Wood |
South Africa | Eastern Cape | Indonesia | All South Africa is occupied |
South Africa | Free State | Brazil | |
South Africa | Gauteng | Brazil | Q5 Defense, High Diamonds |
South Africa | KwaZulu-Natal | Indonesia | |
South Africa | Limpopo | Brazil | High Diamonds |
South Africa | Mpumalanga | Brazil | |
South Africa | North-West | Brazil | |
South Africa | Northern Cape | Indonesia | High Diamonds |
South Africa | Western Cape | Indonesia | |
South Korea | Chuncheongbuk-do | Japan | All of the South Korea is occupied by Japan |
South Korea | Chungcheongnam-do | Japan | |
South Korea | Gangwon-do | Japan | |
South Korea | Gyeonggi-do | Japan | High Grain |
South Korea | Gyeongsangbuk-do | Japan | |
South Korea | Gyeongsangnam-do | Japan | |
South Korea | Jeju | Japan | |
South Korea | Jeollabuk-do | Japan | |
South Korea | Jeollanam-do | Japan | |
Switzerland | French-speaking area | Italy | |
Ukraine | Dnipro | Hungary | |
Ukraine | Siveria | Hungary | Population < 10 |
United Kingdom | Scotland | Hungary | Supposedly region is on loan |
Patterns of Congressional Voting and Party Membership in eUSA
- As of
- Day 592 of the New World (4-July-2009), The 19th US Congress
- Sources
- eUSA wiki page; USA Region pages, USA Election pages, Citizen, Region and Party pages from eRep; Forum postings
- Description
- Graphs and charts show the relative strength of US political parties and voting patterns
- Observations
- About 1 in 5 citizens voted in the last Congressional election.
- Not all Party members voted in the last Congressional election. The number of total votes cast (3,240) was less than the total number of Party members (5,587).
- eUSA Constitution , Article 5 says (emphasis added): "Citizens of the United States of America are allowed to join any of the country's five largest political parties to run for Congress provided that they are level 12 or higher."
- The same Constitution also enshrines "the freedom to bare arms", though it says nothing about either the freedom to bare legs or the freedom to arm bears. :-)
- Conjectures
- On the basis of stated political Orientations, there are two major and two minor blocs of political sentiment in the USA:
- Major blocs: Center-Left and Center-Right
- Minor blocs: Far-Left and Center
- Proportion of blocs inside the top 5 parties is roughly equivalent to the relative bloc sizes when all parties are counted.
- The Far-Left and Center-Right blocs were somewhat under-represented in this Congress as compared to the actual size of their party memberships.
- Corrections, Amendments, Refutations, Notes, and Possible Additional Lines of Inquiry
Thanks! to Robert Bayer (eRep page), who observed that:
- Wiki page Congress of the USA 2009 has some of the same info, with additional types of analysis and graphs.
- Classifying parties on the left-right spectrum is likely not the most accurate way to distinguish them.
And also for suggesting that:
- It would be useful to compile data on which parties have the most members where.
- Data
- Party/Non-Party; Voters/Non-Voters
- Data
Political Blocs, US Congress:
Political Blocs, All Party Members:
Orient. | Abbr. | Name | Party Members | Congress Members | Congress Share | Share of Citizens in Party | Share of All Party Members |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Far-Left | SFP | Socialist Freedom Party | 94 | 1 | 2.0% | 0.6% | 1.7% |
Far-Left | AAP | America's Advancement Party | 678 | 4 | 7.8% | 4.3% | 11.9% |
Center-Left | USWP | United States Workers Party | 1967 | 26 | 51.0% | 12.4% | 34.7% |
Center | UIP | United Independents Party (formerly United Constitutionalists Party) |
525 | 7 | 13.7% | 3.3% | 9.2% |
Center | RP | Republican Party | 75 | 1 | 2.0% | 0.5% | 1.3% |
Center-Right | FP | Federalist Party | 245 | 3 | 5.9% | 1.5% | 4.3% |
Center-Right | USNP | Nationalist Party | 85 | 1 | 2.0% | 0.5% | 1.5% |
Center-Right | Lib | Libertarian Party | 896 | 5 | 9.8% | 5.7% | 15.8% |
Center-Right | CvP | Conservative Party | 670 | 3 | 5.9% | 4.2% | 11.8% |
Center-Left | DeP | Democratic Party | 133 | 0 | 0% | 0.8% | 2.3% |
Center-Left | USGP | United States Green Party (aka Green Party - GDSP) |
102 | 0 | 0% | 0.6% | 1.8% |
Center-Left | IPA | Independent Party of America | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Center-Left | SDP | Social Democractic Party USA | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Center | BGT | In BloodGod We Trust | 22 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
Center | DR3 | Democratic Republic 3rd Party | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Center-Right | URP | Umbrella Research Party | 100 | 0 | 0% | 0.6% | 1.8% |
Center-Right | Rain | Rainbow Party | 8 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Center-Right | AFiP | America First Party (formerly The Yellow Party) |
8 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Far-Right | ARaP | American Radical Party (formerly The Illuminati) |
10 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Far-Right | AFrP | American Freedom Party | 18 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.3% |
Far-Right | ARiP | American Right Party | 21 | 0 | 0% | 0.1% | 0.4% |
Name | Pop. | Representative | Party | Orient. | SFP | AAP | DeP | USGP | USWP | UIP | RP | BGT | FP | NP | LiB | CvP | URP | ARP | Total Votes Cast | Share of Pop. Voted | Winning Plurality | Diamonds | Grain | Wood | Oil | Iron | Hospital |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alaska | 116 | Chris Stanwick | UIP | Center | 5 | 16 | 11 | 32 | 27.6% | 50% | High | Q3 | |||||||||||||||
Arizona | 183 | Kazeal | UIP | Center | 8 | 19 | 2 | 29 | 15.8% | 65.5% | Medium | Q2 | |||||||||||||||
Maryland` | 177 | NeilP99 | UIP | Center | 8 | 17 | 25 | 14.1% | 68% | Medium | Medium | Q4 | |||||||||||||||
New Hampshire | 60 | StygianSteel | UIP | Center | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 14 | 23.3% | 50% | Medium | |||||||||||||||
New Mexico | 53 | Seth Ford | UIP | Center | 9 | 8 | 12 | 1 | 30 | 56.6% | 40% | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
Oklahoma | 99 | Robert S. Miller | UIP | Center | 3 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 18 | 18.2% | 38.9% | Medium | High | Q1 | |||||||||||||
Oregon | 188 | CaptainCAPS | UIP | Center | 15 | 23 | 38 | 20.2% | 60.5% | Medium | Q3 | ||||||||||||||||
Missouri | 158 | Jizzie McGuire (a) | RP | Center | 1 | 13 | (a) | 10 | 24 | 15.2% | 54.2% | Medium | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||
Arkansas | 67 | Killing Time | USWP | Center-Left | 1 | 13 | 10 | 24 | 35.8% | 54.2% | Medium | Medium | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||
California | 1507 | Thomas Anderson | USWP | Center-Left | 168 | 17 | 33 | 11 | 229 | 15.2% | 73.4% | High | High | Q4 | |||||||||||||
D.C. | 197 | Zcia | USWP | Center-Left | 33 | 33 | 16.8% | 100% | Q3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Delware | 29 | James Strife | USWP | Center-Left | 1 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 65.5% | 26.3% | Medium | |||||||||||||||
Florida | 3761 | Ananais | USWP | Center-Left | 71 | 375 | 148 | 102 | 166 | 862 | 22.9% | 43.5% | Medium | Q5 | |||||||||||||
Georgia | 271 | Brad O'Donnell | USWP | Center-Left | 17 | 24 | 23 | 3 | 67 | 24.7% | 35.8% | Medium | Q4 | ||||||||||||||
Idaho | 51 | Kerat | USWP | Center-Left | 9 | 2 | 11 | 21.6% | 81.8% | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||
Illinois | 470 | ligtreb | USWP | Center-Left | 70 | 26 | 96 | 20.4% | 72.9% | High | Q4 | ||||||||||||||||
Indiana | 181 | Ryan Fisher | USWP | Center-Left | 11 | 9 | 20 | 11% | 55% | Medium | Medium | Q2 | |||||||||||||||
Kansas | 111 | LexLuthor1 | USWP | Center-Left | 4 | 12 | 16 | 14.4% | 75% | High | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||
Kentucky | 140 | Jasper Ferguson | USWP | Center-Left | 3 | 19 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 45 | 32.1% | 42.2% | Medium | Medium | Q4 | ||||||||||||
Masachusetts | 242 | PigInZen | USWP | Center-Left | 16 | 16 | 6.6% | 100% | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||||||
Michigan | 312 | Prince Corwin | USWP | Center-Left | 9 | 21 | 6 | 4 | 40 | 12.8% | 52.5% | Medium | Medium | Q3 | |||||||||||||
Minnesota | 145 | Walter Joseph Kovacs | USWP | Center-Left | 17 | 7 | 1 | 25 | 17.2% | 68% | Medium | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
Montana | 53 | Lenore Rosborough | USWP | Center-Left | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 15.1% | 75% | High | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
New York | 1082 | Cerb | USWP | Center-Left | 7 | 112 | 9 | 29 | 157 | 14.5% | 71.3% | Q3 | |||||||||||||||
North Carolina | 195 | Lorenzo Serafini | USWP | Center-Left | 2 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 32 | 16.4% | 43.8% | Medium | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||
Ohio | 373 | GoBucks | USWP | Center-Left | 1 | 30 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 49 | 13.1% | 61.2% | Medium | Q3 | |||||||||||||
Rhode Island | 56 | Vincent Truglia | USWP | Center-Left | 9 | 8 | 17 | 30.4% | 52.9% | Q2 | |||||||||||||||||
South Carolina | 81 | Augustis | USWP | Center-Left | 4 | 7 | 6 | 17 | 21% | 41.2% | Medium | Medium | |||||||||||||||
Tennessee | 185 | Gaius Julius | USWP | Center-Left | 17 | 8 | 25 | 13.5% | 68% | Medium | High | Q3 | |||||||||||||||
Virginia | 293 | Dmalicious | USWP | Center-Left | 27 | 23 | 11 | 61 | 20.8% | 44.3% | Medium | Medium | Q4 | ||||||||||||||
Washington | 444 | Dania | USWP | Center-Left | 6 | 40 | 2 | 10 | 58 | 13.1% | 69% | High | Q2 | ||||||||||||||
West Virginia | 53 | SirEkim | USWP | Center-Left | 1 | 8 | 8 | 17 | 32.1% | 47.1% | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
Wisconsin | 149 | Bill Forder | USWP | Center-Left | 11 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 11.4% | 64.7% | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
Alabama | 120 | Joe Newton | CvP | Center-Right | 8 | 7 | 11 | 26 | 21.7% | 42.3% | Medium | Q3 | |||||||||||||||
Iowa | 81 | Matttoze5 | CvP | Center-Right | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 12.3% | 50% | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
Nebraska | 64 | Desertfalcon | CvP | Center-Right | 3 | 8 | 11 | 17.2% | 72.7% | Medium | Q2 | ||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania | 326 | Cromstar | CvP | Center-Right | 21 | 24 | 45 | 13.8% | 53.3% | Medium | High | Q2 | |||||||||||||||
Wyoming | 28 | wingfield | CvP | Center-Right | 2 | 1 | 13 | 16 | 57.1% | 81.3% | Medium | Q1 | |||||||||||||||
Connecticut | 101 | Joe DaSmoe (b) | NP | Center-Right | 2 | 1 | (b) | 4 | 7 | 6.9% | 57.1% | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
Colorado | 243 | Daphne Liliac | Lib | Center-Right | 20 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 58 | 23.9% | 36.2% | Medium | Q4 | ||||||||||||||
Hawaii | 114 | James Harding | Lib | Center-Right | 12 | 13 | 25 | 21.9% | 52% | Q3 | |||||||||||||||||
Louisiana | 95 | Jame S Pfeiffer | Lib | Center-Right | 11 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 30 | 31.6% | 43.3% | Medium | High | Q1 | |||||||||||||
Mississippi | 47 | Bill Brasky | Lib | Center-Right | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 19.1% | 44.4% | Medium | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
New Jersey | 1880 | Claire Littleton | Lib | Center-Right | 146 | 71 | 26 | 252 | 41 | 536 | 28.5% | 47% | Medium | Q5 | |||||||||||||
Texas | 873 | Cujo Mayo | Lib | Center-Right | 9 | 28 | 27 | 60 | 23 | 147 | 16.8% | 40.8% | Medium | High | Q4 | ||||||||||||
Vermont | 49 | Emerick | Lib | Center-Right | 1 | 1 | 11 | 21 | 34 | 69.4% | 61.8% | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
Maine | 70 | seeker1 | AAP | Far-Left | 11 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 30 | 42.9% | 36.7% | Medium | Q3 | |||||||||||||
Nevada | 93 | Woxan | AAP | Far-Left | 11 | 8 | 19 | 20.4% | 57.9% | Medium | |||||||||||||||||
North Dakota | 26 | Nick Bezier | AAP | Far-Left | 10 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 73.1% | 52.6% | High | ||||||||||||||||
Utah | 92 | Tormod | AAP | Far-Left | 10 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 25 | 27.2% | 40% | Medium | Q1 | ||||||||||||||
South Dakota | 26 | Robert Bayer (c) | SFP | Far-Left | (c) | 9 | 13 | 22 | 84.6% | 59.1% | High | Q1 |
(a) Ran on USWP ticket, switched to RP after election
(b) Ran on CvP ticket, switched to USNP after election
(c) Ran on UIP ticket, switched to SFP after election
Total | AAP | USWP | UIP | LiB | CvP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3240 | 399 | 1303 | 390 | 728 | 420 |
12.3% | 40.2% | 12.0% | 22.5% | 13.0% |