eRepublik Official Wiki talk:Religion policy

From eRepublik Official Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

This is official talk to propose religions and vote for them. If you would like to add proposal for new religion, do it at the bottom of the page by adding the name of the religion as section (title) name, and all of the required information for the religion. Also, when creating a proposal in your user space, feel free to use Template:Religion to help you with your setup.


Religion proposals in 2009.

Lewdaism, please?

This is a long-awaited day. I hope there will be very little stopping this page from being included now. User:Geno_Garon/Lewdaism

Let's get Lewdaism in the wiki! --Geno Garon Icon-USA.png : Just trying to get by... 02:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Though they are not dieties, I assume Desertfalcon and Emerick have no problems with their names being associated with this article? I want to get another opinion, but so far, I think this meets the criteria.--QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 14:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
As I can see from the talk page it was a big debate with Lewis and Geno about the Lewdaism. If Lewis don't have any objection, I think that the we could and should approve this religion. --AndyCro Icon-Croatia.png Click here to talk with me baby! ;) 14:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I think the policy said that if the person the religion is created after disagrees, then it isn't allowed. Michael Lewis disagreed with it, so unless he's changed his mind, wiki policy is fairly b&w imo. But get his approval, and yes I think it should be on the wiki. \o/ Pierric Bross 22:23, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
If you guys notice, there is no mention of who "Lewis" is. Or even that it is Michael Lewis. Forget EVERYTHING you "know" about Lewdaism and reread it. We must take the article as it is written, now, without the "historical baggage". Don't even look at the talk page, which I suggest be removed. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 02:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Okay. I have read it once. Looks legit to me. In favor of allowing having its own page in the main space (although I or other contributors can anytime discuss about improvements on this religion article- or the other religions articles for that matter). Regarding the talk page, I propose we archive it with Archive box collapsible. --Geo (talk) 15:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Lewdaism is officially approved. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 18:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


I want to add a section to this policy concerning small religions, non-approved religions, and other miscellany (Which I will refer to as cults) and how they are to be handled. Before doing so, let's establish a consensus on where the Wiki should stand on certain situations in the game that have yet to be covered.

Adminism is disallowed on the Wiki because Admin does not approve of being worshiped. However, it has persistently remained in some way, shape, or form in the game, notably in Germany and the United States, and has been 'founded' on numerous occasions based on the same concepts. Since Wiki policies such as EREP:REL aren't necessarily followed in the game itself it's bound to be alive and kicking somewhere though uncovered because it is an invalid religion, though I don't think this means that there shouldn't be an article about the subject (This is similar to my stance on the phrase PIG DISGUSTING).

Zammuelism is a new religion that has formed in the last few months by former Administs and Off-Topic riffraff looking to create a more valid religion. As of late it has not been approved, and points have been raised by myself and others that the religion is a carbon copy of Dioism. Though Zammuel has the beginnings of an article, Zammuelism does not, and they have made no attempt to gain approval.

So, my idea on handling these non-approved religions is to give them "cult" status. They are not approved as religions, but since they persist in the game and are not breaking the eRepublik Laws by doing so, they can be treated as cults. According to Ticket ARN-767794, the term 'Cultist' is inoffensive, so this would not be discriminating against Adminism, Zammuelism, or any other unapproved religion.

Thoughts? - –Dr. AgentChieftain Flag of the Crescent and Star PPP! B / C / D / F / P / S 19:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Good stuff. There are definitely a lot of cults popping up in eRepublik recently, and they deserve some recognition, since they add to the experience, even if they don't follow the eReligion rules to the letter. I approve of this idea to catch those who fall through the cracks. Maybe just showing that it has a successful following, like more than 2 people consistently commenting approval on articles or in threads would be enough of a guideline ----Emerick 20:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I (kind of) do not agree with it. "Approved religions" have strong known implications in the New World, they are not just religions - they are movements: politics - Lewdaism, economy - Dioism, military - Theocracy. Even The Order of Gaia can be seen as a "religion". I do not see Zammuel as a "religion"; I don't even see it as a "cult". Implications? None, from my point of view. What is the page? A page created by a citizen with a lot of imagination. Do you understand what I mean? --Belea2008 00:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


I ask approval... for my religion, tewionism. Links to articles in my sandboxes which include information about the religion:

I asked approval for my religion at Religion Policy. --Erius

I am not sure if I will have time to review this weekend but I will get to it. However, I ask all people to read the articles and the policy and weigh in with their opinions. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 05:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
I've read through the pages provided. If we do accept them on the wiki as an established religion, external sourcing and work on the pages will be necessary. There seems to be no evidence that this is an established religion anywhere besides in the sandbox. Add a few links to forums, newspaper articles, etc. about the religion and I will take another look, but as of right now, I would have to disapprove its inclusion as a religion. --Chris Stanwick 16:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Chris. Conception is good, but if this religion will be accepted more work on the articles will have to be done. --AndyCro Icon-Croatia.png Click here to talk with me baby! ;) 18:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, these articles do not meet the following criteria:
  1. Religions must display some sort of relevance to the game.
  2. Religions must begin and gather followers in forums or IRC chats before a page is created in the Wiki (and show proof of believers)

Also, can you give some information where the name "Tewio" comes from? Is this something that you came up with yourself? --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 19:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

This religion really excist in the game. Here are couple of my article`s i`ve wrote in game about it:

There`s also a political party in Singapore which is formed there by tewionist`s:

What it comes to name "Tewio", it means "The White One" in a old "secret language" i`ve personally made. When i and my comrades created this religion we didn`t wanted to name someone of us as a god and so we decided to create a "neutral" figure as our god.

I hope that these links will answer to some questions. If there`s something more you want to know i can try to get more proves that this religion really excist`s. I can give you some names of our order`s members but only couple of them has a wikiaccount. -Erius

Having read the articles, I am more convinced that Tewionism is a political/military organization rather than a religion. It doesn't have the characteristics of a religion, nor have you provided evidence of it existing on any forum. The articles that you wrote in your newspaper do not count as evidence as it does not prove that it is an established religion. A religion must have followers/adherents and a social community in which the religion is discussed. I see you have an IRC channel, which is one step forward, but more evidence is necessary. Unless proved otherwise, I would characterize the White Lion Order as a political organization with a military branch. --Chris Stanwick 14:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, we doesn`t have any forums etc. We will do forums for us and try to get more evidences for you, but till that we don`t have any proves. I will take contact again when there`s more proves about our religion. --Erius
You do not need to have a separate forum for Tewionism, just proof that the religion exists on any forum. For example, check out the following sub-board on the US forum concerning religions: eReligion Board. Even with proof of forum activity, though, Tewionism still seems to have the characteristics of a political/military organization rather than a religion. --Chris Stanwick 14:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I disagree Chris. As soon as a godhead is incorporated into the organization... it is a religion. If it is more of a political/military org, then the religion part could be stripped and it could just be that, a military/political org. Once you bring any talk of religion, this policy comes into effect. As far as forums, is there any mention of this in the eRep forums? The Dioists and Zammanuelists are all over the forums. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 14:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I started some discussion about our religion in forums. In that topic there`s link to our religions forums which i made for our community couple of days ago. Still i fear that this isn`t enough :)

Link to that topic: --Erius


Hello. I have written the first draft of the "Zammuelism" page. I have not used templates as requested but did bold the different categories for ease of reading. See here: - Zammuel 13:53, 8 October 2009

One thing that the article needs more than anything else is sources. Though I can confirm that everything currently in the article is true, it's going to need citations to enforce the page's verity. For instance, although it is a current event and thus easily found after a whole two minutes of research, Dio Brando's approval should be cited to ensure that future readers will be able to confirm the event.
Also, I've taken the liberty to add a quote template and correct the formatting to fit the rest of the Wiki, though it can still use an infobox like {{Dioism}} and {{Lidoxa}}.
Finally, I moved the page to User:Zammuel/Zammuelism so you will be able to move the page to Zammuelism once it's finished. - –Dr. AgentChieftain Flag of the Crescent and Star PPP! B / C / D / F / P / S 18:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


Basically, this: I might create two sub-pages for ~hyuu~ and -anuu- tomorrow as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HuCard (talkcontribs)

Um your religion started today? --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 00:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Somewhat. It's actually built around an older Canadian meme which involves Nosyt spamming ~hyuu~, which had gone on for months. Today I merely decided it would be amusing to make that the centre of an eReligion, which many approved of.—Preceding unsigned comment added by HuCard (talkcontribs)


I ask approval for the creation of a new eReligion, called Sadehism! The theoretical aspects of this new ereligion is still WIP and therefore no really useful content is added yet(until the approval at least!). The establishment is mentioned in my userspace (User:CybeRNerO/Sadehism) which i intend(after the approval) to move it to the REAL part of wiki and start adding more information! (Plus a Template).

We already have an IRC channel (in Rizon server, channel #sadehism [1] ) where we gather ppl, and an organization created for that purpose.--CybeRNerO 13:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

We can't approve a religion that essentially doesn't exist yet. The religion must be established BEFORE any mention of it can be in the wiki. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 01:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Church of Boblo

Hi. I have written two pages - a religion description, and scriptures page. The description can be found here: F Baker/Sandbox The scriptures, here: F Baker/The_Holy_Spamible

I want to make this an official religion. Any help? John F Baker 22:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

This seems to not be about eRepublik, but the eUk Forums... am I correct? --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 02:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
/me facepalms. No, it is an erepublik religion. It just revolves around the eUK forum community. Read the thing and it sorta makes that clear... John F Baker 06:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is perfectly clear it is about the eUK forums... I suppose this is different than the other eReligions because they were started and grew in the eRepublik forum, not in outside forums. I added some places where references are needed in the article. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 19:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I am resurrecting the Bobloism due to the demand from the UK/Ireland population, it is located here: Bobloism The references are done (if content still exists). Abedecian 17:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Religions must display some sort of relevance to the game. I still don't find relevance to the game eRepublik... The religion is centered around a forum in the eUK Forum and spamming, correct? Why is that relevant? Because some eRepublik players are doing it in an off-topic section of a forum? --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 17:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Dear QJ Lincoln,
This religion is now firmly imprinted in the UK's society - it is not simply a "herp spam in forum" matter any more, as it first was, but instead an ideology. We have recently implemented a Monarchy and various chivalric orders that relate to the United Kingdom, and the Monarch (soon to be crowned) will be pronouncing Bobloism (or more accurately, The Church of Boblo) as the national religion, as some Country Presidents for the UK have done before.
As Dio and his "sand story" was deemed relevant by the wiki admins, so too should Boblo and his "spamesis". It is an ideology of social release and transcends the forums into the very culture and identity of the UK.
The full list of Bobloist material can be found here. Please do not shrug this off with simplifying conclusions, based on the many followers of our religion!
John F Baker 19:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

(unindent) The issues QJ presented previously were not necessarily resolved before it was "resurrected". I'm giving my tentative -1 vote unless I see some significant proof that corresponds, satisfies, and aligns with our religion policy. Icon-USA.png - Jameson L. Tai talk/United States Rangers 01:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Jan, this isn't a blow against you or your represented religion, but I believe that there's still some untended business that needs to be addressed before I'd support it. United States Rangers.png - Jameson L. Tai talk/United States Rangers 01:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll be honest, Im not exactly sure what else you want :/ Dioism, in comparison, has about the same relevance to the game as Bobloism. Zammuelism is another - its the worship of PIE or something? Lewdaism seems even LESS relevant to eRepublik - it's the worship of some 3 month old eUS citizen (?), without any specific focus on anything. In comparison, Bobloism is the worship of one of the UK's most awesome citizens, and of actually DOING things.
I'm not trying to burn other religions, but come on :/ - John F Baker 11:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
this document shows the true identity of the UK - Dioism. No Bobloism approval in my eyes yet. --DanielDimow||Speak to me. 12:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
That's four months old :| Mr Woldy last month declared Bobloism as the state religion. John F Baker 14:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
One in... how big of a list? United States Rangers.png - Jameson L. Tai talk/United States Rangers 19:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I dont understand what you're asking :) - John F Baker 00:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I'd like a real list of things that are wrong with the current pages, tbh. I cant see any real pointers other than 'it doesnt seem relevant', which is completely incorrect. :S John F Baker 00:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I (kind of) do not agree with it. "Approved religions" have strong known implications in the New World, they are not just religions - they are movements: politics - Lewdaism, economy - Dioism, military - Theocracy. Even The Order of Gaia can be seen as a "religion". I do not see Bobloism as a "religion"; I don't even see it as a "cult". Implications? None, from my point of view. What is the page? A page created by a citizen with a lot of imagination. Do you understand what I mean? --Belea2008 08:07, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
"A page created by a citizen with a lot of imagination" - ahh, but this was not created by one citizen. It was created by many many citizens - I simply compiled it. Bobloism can be seen as a movement devoted to society, no? John F Baker 20:56, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
No. lolz you opened the door by ending the sentence with a question ;) United States Rangers.png - Jameson L. Tai talk/United States Rangers 02:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


Religion proposals in 2010.


Requesting approval for Janeralism. Its been around for months. High time it had its own page. Aeros

See User talk:Aeros/Janeralism for my first take--QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 01:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


I ask to have a new religion started called Timeoinism, information can be found here:

As a Timeoinite I too would like this added as an eReligion - there are quite a few of us who already have it on our personal wiki pages
This is more of a cult of personality. And seems to be a big joke. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 13:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
As a fellow Timeoinite i would like to see this religion acknowledged :) --Astintus Talk To Me 01:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I am also a Timeoinite and this religion is growing rapidly. I would like to see it recognised. --Binda33
I too am a Timeoinite and this religion is quite well known throughout eAustralia. I would love to see it officialy recognised and properly understood by all. --M0TT0M
I am also a proud Timeoinite. It's too good not to be recognised. Timeoinism is the way to go --Darth Spader
I think all religions are ultimately a big joke. Heh. ^_^. But yeah, I'd support Timeoinism as a sect of Wikidia (aka. addiction/worship or the wiki) ~ Icon-Japan.png Laurana "Psi" Icon-Malaysia.png ~ (My Whiteboard) 14:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Like many other players I`m also a Timeoinite, although a new one. And are all those religions a big jokes? So let`s not take it too seriously ;) --Erius
As a proud Timeoinite, I think that Timeoinism should be recognised as a religion for not only is it a belief, it is a way of life. -Greenlamp,
In Croatia we have a Donald Duck religion, so are they any serious eReligions? :D --AndyCro Icon-Croatia.png Click here to talk with me baby! ;) 13:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
The way I see it, this "religion" lacks relevance to the game eRepublik... you know the game we play? --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 15:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Its an eReligion based upon Wikiing. I quote from the Welcome page for new wiki users: " The eRepublik Wiki is a collection of articles about eRepublik; created, edited, and maintained by the citizens of the New World. The wiki is the central point for game tips, general information, and history. " Surely that would, therefore, be related to eRepublik, QJ ? -- Timeoin (im going to assume that was my quote)
I, Timeoin, Agree to this eReligion, and therefore it does not break Rule 2.2 --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin| Say G'Day to Timeoin 12:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Cult of personality. I can get 5 people to say I am awesome at the wiki too, do I start a religion about it? Blech. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 16:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Dont joke about that, QJ, or ill start up the Cult of Lincolnism :D Seriously though - it has a fairly big following in eAustralia, but I see you're point. --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin|Say G'Day 04:27, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Angry You start an eReligion about me, I will shake the earth and send lightning bolts down upon you mortals :D !!!! --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 13:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Question mark Doing so would merely prove that you are, indeed, an eGoddess? --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin|Say G'Day 14:19, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Ill see if anyone else wants to work on the page. (DeanKong quit the Wiki scene). Timeoinism is a rising eReligious force (seen the Contribution Scores for the past month? :P) - and it already has an active forum section on the eAustralian forums and a fair few followers (not as many as Dioism, but still a fair few). Game relevance shall be provided shortly. --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin|Say G'Day 14:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


A new religion has been formed, based in Canadad, called Omegism. Based around Adam Sutler/Craig Norman. Not to get into too many details here, I just wished to post this change for people to discuss it. I am hoping I have done everything correctly (i.e. Editing the Religion page to get it to go to OMEGISM / Creation of the Omegism Page). If there are any errors, please let me know and I can help fix it / tell you my intentions for that. Thanks. 00AngryMobMan00 22:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


Requesting approval for Frerkism

User:Frerk/Sandbox#Followers_of_Frerkism --FrerkIcon-Netherlands.pngBore me! 12:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

The first Cared One support, endorse, and follows the teachings of Frerkism passionately. --Konrad Neumann 12:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Konrad Neumann
The White Wolf declares his support for this request as a devote follower of the teachings of Frerk. --Alexander Matteo 12:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Alexander Matteo
The Prophet of Darkness declares his support for the only true religion, Frerkism.--Nattzor 14:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
I support Frerkism --Fhaemita Malodorous 12:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
I haven't been involved in religion related things in Wiki, but I have some things I'd like to point out. First of all, it lacks references. There is one, but it links to a newspaper article that doesn't even mention the religion. Also, please provide proof that there actually are followers to this religion. And the page has very little information overall. You might want to have a look of the bigger eReligions' pages. Otherwise it looks fine to me.--Icon-Finland.png Kuhaa|sTalk to me! 16:11, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Aren't the people who are trying to sign providing proof they're followers? Anyway, we indeed need more references --FrerkIcon-Netherlands.pngBore me! 16:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Please review the criteria for eReligions. This article in no way has enough supporting evidence. --QJ Lincoln Talk To Me 01:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Five followers don't make a religion. I'm talking about forums, newspaper articles etc that prove this is a real thing and not just a joke between a few friends. --Icon-Finland.png Kuhaa|sTalk to me! 09:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


Can we add Quigley/Userspace/Nubcakeism Nubcakeism to Religions of eRepublik? Nubcake.jpg Icon-Australia.png Rowan Quigley Talk to me! 02:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Links of Pages below:

Quigley/Userspace/NubcakeismMenu Nubcakeism Menu

I Konrad Neumann was blessed by the Holy Nubcake. I will follow Nubcake as my eFaith. Konrad Neumann 02:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

i suggest before we vote, let us write a bit more :/ ---- Icon-Netherlands.png Icon-Australia.png Tim Veltkamp| Nubcakes? 12:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
what Tim said :/ --Icon-Australia.png Sir Terrifico | ♪~Say hello to Terrifico~♪ | Nubcakes! 12:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
ALL HAIL THE eGOD of BELEAISM!! --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin|Say G'Day 12:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)



Rokcisticusm is a religion based on the belief on the Faceless God Rockisticus.

Rockisticus has returned in day 1,069 of the new world (24th Oct 2010) by a resurrection spell from his three God sons:

  1. Emorfion - The first son, Congress memeber, memebr of the ICP, owner of Yedioth Aharonoth newspaper, lives in Israel in Jerusalem.
  2. Kwr9 - The second son, memeber of the ICP, lives in Israel in Jerusalem.
  3. Jacobaus - The thered son, PP of URU, owner of The Sticker Times newspaper, lives in United States of America in New York.

The description of RockisticusRockisticus is described as a Man streching a sheet across his face.

Rockisticus is the son of the god Lencorthius and the Godess Irnintianah.

He was married to the godess Leilah on the 20th of November 2007 and divorced her on the 24th of Ocotber 2010.

Rockisticus was born to the god Lencorthius' and the godess Irninatianah in the almost beginning of time (no one really remembers, not even Rockisticus). His age is currently 13,756,985,849 years.

When Rockisticus was born, his father inchanted 2 spells on him:

  • Vicis eo alica (Desappearing through time spell)
  • Ingredior per haud visio alica (Face desappearing spell)

When Rockisticus was 13 his father explained to him why this spell is current, and that he had the same spell when he was a child. To remove the spell, you must discover Voluntas of Vita (Meaning of Life)

When Rockisticus turned 5 months he learned the power of lighning, he used it to burn down villages with people who laught at him when he and his parents went for a walk.

When Rockisticus turned 9 months he learned the power of Reviving and Creation, he used it upon villages with good people, that treated him well, he helped the illed and grow food and make water flow to the village.

When Rockisticus turned a year old, his first word was: Decus (Honor), and that became one of the philosophical ideas of Rockisticusm.

Rockisticus wrote 6 books, they are all about the future of eRepublik, all of them together are called Books of Rockisticus:

Each one tells a different story.

-1 Absolutely not. Icon-Taiwan.png- Jameson L. Tai talk/Minister of Defense and Director of National Intelligence 07:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Why the hell not?! It is comlies to all of eRepublik religion policy rules and all the fictional content rules! please be more clear! Emorfion/Talk to me!Icon-Israel.png

-1 Dude. If the religion, Bobloism (all about an actual erepublik citizen and his actual erepublik citizen followers), was rejected, this vastly expanded piece of imaginative writing, with apparently only two real followers, will definitely not be approved.
I can see literally no relevance to erepublik at all in this, other than this mystical rock dude phropecizing the future of the game - hardly something to make a religion about, eh? - Icon-UK.png John F Baker Icon-South Africa.png talk/British Army librarian 15:20, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Listen man, I'll explain to you. You see the religion talkes about a New New eRepublik, a place with no wars and only peace, all the citizens on eRepublik will know the meaning of existance, but only after they will accept the change, if not, the great wars of the Scripture of Rockisticusm will come true, if they will, Rockisticus will tell them all the meaning of life. He and Dio. But look at Lewdaism. it was approved, and it is about, not a god, but a citizen with no back story that lived in eRepublik for only 3 months then bailed. Rockisticus will have more influance on people and will give them hope to stay in eRepublik and live the life as they should, to the time of the eternity of Peace. Emorfion/Talk to me!Icon-Israel.png

-1 I will never accept this even if this was the last eReligion in the eWorld. Icon-Switzerland.png Rowan Quigley Talk to me! 06:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Man if your saying that, please tell why!Emorfion/Talk to me!Icon-Israel.png

Don't delete this discussion :/ - Icon-UK.png John F Baker Icon-South Africa.png talk/British Army librarian 17:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
You are not allowed to remove discussion pages that do not belong to you. Consider this your one and only warning. Icon-Taiwan.png- Jameson L. Tai talk/Minister of Defense and Director of National Intelligence 23:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


Intellectus (Latin:Understanding) is a religious philosophical prespctive that is built of three philosophical ideas:

  • Voluptas Perspective
  • Homoistic Prespective
  • Abdicativus Perspective

Intellectus, Read full article...

The Ideas: The Ideas Intellectus are:

  • Voluptas Perspective - Pleasure Perspective
  • Homoistic Perspective - Humanian Perspective
  • Abdicatvus Perspective - Negetivaty Perspective

The religion is necessary to eRepublik to show them the Ideas of the world, and the understanding of the world in three ways.

Hope you will approve!


-1 Icon-Switzerland.png Rowan Quigley Talk to me! 09:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

-1 This is more ofa socio-political theory, methinks? - Icon-UK.png John F Baker Icon-South Africa.png talk/British Army librarian 17:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
No actually its more of a way of life religion. like buddhism in the RW...Blemper|TalkIcon-Pakistan.pngIcon-Israel.png


Kiwism is the official state religion of New Zealand. It's telling about a Holy Golden Kiwi that was created from a Holy Wool, that was all over the eUniverse. The Holy Golden Kiwi created the first man from the Holy Wool, and New Zealand. Then he created the entire eRepublik, and it's nations. When the Holy Golden Kiwi created the Admin, he gave him too much power, so the Holy Golden Kiwi was banned from the Holy Wool, and the Golden Kiwi, with the first New Zealanders, set the Holy Wool on the Sheeps of New Zealand. Later on the Admin banned every one from New Zealand, to create eRepublik. The first man was married, have children and later on became a grand father, and like very one, he died. His descendant, Michael the prophet (Fictional charecter) went throught the world, teaching the Word of the Golden Kiwi, all over the world. Then the Evil rised, and Evilus (MUAHAHAHA!) was created. (The muhahaha part is because in the last book of the Book of Kiwi, Evilus [MUHAHAHAHAHA!] attacked eNZ, after the Admin approved her, and in the end Wellington was saved and it's shows that the eNew Zealanders defeated Evilus [MUHAHAHA!]).

The Book of Kiwi is built from 10 parts - Firstly Instructions and then the Chapters of the book.

The Kiwism religion has already 5 followers:

Please approve this religion Alexander Janai|Talk to me!Icon-New Zealand.png 15:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Can you add Australianism too then? :P --Icon-Australia.png Timeoin|Say G'Day 16:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
lol no... I'm kinda more focused on Kiwism right now... XP. I know you were sarcastic...Alexander Janai|Talk to me!Icon-New Zealand.png 16:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


Religion proposals in 2011.

Chaos theory

Hello, I made a Religion Page after I attempted to follow the rules, it was deleted but my original request still remains here: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waruda (talkcontribs) .

-1 "Chaos Theory is the state religion of no eRepublik nation" says it all. There isn't enough followers to be considered as religion. It doesn't meet "Religions must display some sort of relevance to the game." requirement. No thanks! --Icon-Finland.png sampo555 | Talk 09:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Ok I'll try to gather followers, and try again O_O --Dan Murchadh 09:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

0 Just outta curiosity, does a religion have to be a State Religion before it gains inclusion in the wiki? Don't get me wrong, I don't really like the idea of religions in this game, but it is what it is. --Icon-USA.png Citizen 6  Ribbon addition - Silver Award Star.png Talk   09:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
-1 Same than sampo555: not enough followers and stuff already created in my opinion. ||||||Khebit TC| 10:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
-1 Yeah... it needs more followers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by John F Baker (talkcontribs)


Requests approval for the religion Sacramentism. Its quite new and we'd like it if it could have its own page. [[5]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlanta Boy9 (talkcontribs)

Do you have so proof about amount of followers? --Icon-Finland.png sampo555 | Talk 13:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
It says the amount of followers in my link, there are 5 followers: mimiche4, Atlanta Boy9, Veniacles De Saint Preux, Henrique nGael de Sousa and Garnier de Naplouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlanta Boy9 (talkcontribs) --Atlanta Boy9 13:31, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Atlanta Boy9
That's not enough for religion in my opinion. Get some more followers and try again then. --Icon-Finland.png sampo555 | Talk 13:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
How many would you suggest then?--Atlanta Boy9 13:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Atlanta Boy9


Religion proposals in 2012.


I am requesting for the approval of Guillotinism, a religion which was founded in Switzerland for some months now. I think it's time that it is recognized as an official religion.
-VietDragon 12:10, 13 April 2012


info about jochhism could be found here :D

So far there's about 30 for sure followers. The numbers will grow soon. Jochhism is the religion of the future!!!

-1 An absolutely no go. --DanielDimow||Speak to me. 13:48, 30 October 2012 (PDT)
-1 No, from my point of view it's no near being a religion. --"Icon-Switzerland.png Gucio" 16:17, 30 October 2012 (PDT)
Why? It's a well known religion in Cyprus.--"killer2001" 12:24, 31 October 2012 (EST)
-1 No, from my point of view it's no near being a religion. -- Wonne - 12:48, 01.11.2012 [GMT+1]
wonne, your comment sounds almost like gucio's, please write down an original comment next time --"killer2001" 15:40, 01 November 2012 (EST)
-1 No. --Sre8renica 14:19, 1 November 2012 (PDT)
-1 If you can't accept Jochhism as a religion in the eWorld....Why??? For strong followers like me, I am offended.... --Jochhi 11:28, November 2 2012 (GMT+2)
check out this article that's about adding jochhism"killer2001" 07:58, 02 November 2012 (EST)
WE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE, WE FIGHT FOR OUR RELIGION! Killer2001 knki, link here: --Jochhi 16:17, November 2 2012 (GMT+2)
jochhi!!!! you found the right article!!!!! --"killer2001" 12:05, 02 November 2012 (EST)
-1 I'm against "supporting" this "religion". --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo talk:Grzechooo drop a line 09:38, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
LOL, you don't support this religion because you don't know anything about it, same with all of you! JUSTICE NOW!! JUSTICE!!!!! --Jochhi 19:19, November 2 2012 (GMT+2)
To sum up, the religion page submitted is quite far from the guidelines found on the religion policy page. The ideology of the religion is found as not so serious by the Wiki Administration, as well as up to certain degree spam is against the eRepublik Rules. Therefore the Wiki Administration/Sysops has made a final decision that this religion will not get approved or marked as official. --"Icon-Switzerland.png Gucio" 10:43, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
AGAIN, I SAY, WE FIGHT FOR JUSTICE AGAINST OPPRESORS!!! We have 30 believers!! Your religion policy is telling us what we have to do in our religion??? You can never change us, we are Jochhists!!!!I find it offensive that you insult my elife!We don't care about the eRepublik rules, that is not in the nature of a Jochhist!Jochhism is about fun!So to be accepted in this wiki, we have to be boring???NEVER! --Jochhi 20:00, November 2 2012 (GMT+2)
You will start caring about rules when you'll get banned due to them. --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo talk:Grzechooo drop a line 11:03, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
I really hope this is a joke, jochhi. "Jochhism" I lol'd. This is ridicolous!--LongliveIRA 11:02, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
You insult me and my ereligion and you threaten me ban?? GOD SAVE ME! --Jochhi 20:07, 2 November 2012 (GMT+2)
I'm pointing out a possibility, not threatening. --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo] talk:Grzechooo drop a line 12:21, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
I hate all of you people (as wiki moderators) anyways, i updated the wiki --"killer2001" 17:32, 02 November 2012 (EST)
@Killer Don't insult them, they wont add our wiki, they are our friends and we will offer them the spirits of Jochhism! --Jochhi 0:07 November 3 2012 (GMT+2)
I'm not insulting them, i love all of these people, i think about them every day and night. As some important guy in jochhism, I make the word "hate" means "love" only on fridays of november. So i hate all of you!!!!!!!! And jochhi, why do you play this game in midnight, it's just a game!!!!!!! --"killer2001" 18:22, 02 November 2012 (EST)
Just a little note, by offering people food in order to get them to join the "religion" will definitely not make it get added, no matter how many members you collect using this way. --"Star.png Gucio" 16:18, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
It's religious free food, just like in RL, so people will be proud for being a jochhist --"killer2001" 19:36, 02 November 2012
Of course it is like in RL, though there is a huge difference when it's offered for people which actually follow the "religion", rather than buying people to join the "religion" to get the food, which I guess can gain you 100 followers which most are fake, since they follow the "religion" for the sake of getting the food. --"Star.png Gucio" 16:42, 2 November 2012 (PDT)
good point, I'll ask questions about jochhism to jochhists on certain weeks so they could receive food. If they don't answer it correctly they will not get food. --"killer2001" 20:16, 02 November 2012

We are not gonna tell people that they get the food! When I go to Church every week on rl, I recieve bread, everyone recieves bread...why not in this game?? @Killer I play this game late because in Cyprus you stay up late and wake up late! --Jochhi 11:24 November 3 2012 (GMT+2)

Only True believers get food! We are not going to waste food on people who don't worship correctly ect. We will never bribe for members! --Jochhi 11:26 November 3 11:26 (GMT+2)

It's not "religious", it's a simple bribe. --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo] talk:Grzechooo drop a line 03:44, 3 November 2012 (PDT)

It's not bribe! Only true jochhists get offerings! the spirits do not give food to fakers who just want the food!

wiki moderators, I'm working on creating more info about jochhism and pages about jochhism in my sandbox. Hopefully you'll approve this religion next time :) --"killer2001" 19:33, 03 November 2012


I want this religion to be added that's called jochhism. Information about it can be found here

As you can see, there are already 13 pages and a template. 6 jhurches(church in jochhism) already have a wiki. The other wiki pages are about the other things of jochhism has to offer. So please add jochhism wiki page!

-1 Still a no from me --"Star.png Gucio" 04:13, 10 November 2012 (PST)
-1 again. --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo] talk:Grzechooo drop a line 05:48, 10 November 2012 (PST)
-1 one more time -- Wonne -- 14:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Go suck plato d*** :) Sorry if you are too young for know that kids -- Jochhi -- 17:03, 10 November 2012 (GMT+2)

You just crossed the line of my patience. I'll start banning anyone who mentions something about Jochhi, Jochhism (although it should be named "Trollism"). --Icon-Poland.png Grzechooo] talk:Grzechooo drop a line 07:23, 10 November 2012 (PST)
Any reason why you don't approve this religion? --killer2001" 11:04, 10 November 2012 (EST)
Well, considering you have made a page of people who are against the religion, hadn't really made it a good start. In my two years as Administrator and previous year as editor, I don't think we've approved one religion and that's because it is usually not followed by enough people. Dioism is a religion because of it's followers and impact it had during the early days of eRepublik. I personally don't see that happening with your religion. -- Icon-South Africa.png Mikhail Alexander | Talk 19:03, 10 November 2012 (PST)
Also, -1 -- Icon-South Africa.png Mikhail Alexander | Talk 04:54, 12 November 2012 (PST)
With today's actions made by killer2001 User_talk:Wonne, User_talk:Sre8renica the request of adding Jochhism as a official religion has been rejected. Due to the fact this is your 2nd rejected request this month, as well as considering the behaviour of one of the creators there has been a 3 months exclusion period applied, in which you will not be allowed to make any requests to add Jochhism, as any request made will be rejected. --"Star.png Gucio" 12:56, 14 November 2012 (PST)


Request to add eSwiftism as Religion

Greetings, I would kindly request to add eSwiftism as new religion in eRepublik. I has just recently been created (at the time of writing this 1 day) but we have already 1 article (there used to be 4 but the first articles were deleted due to Spam :() and there are more coming (again, at the time of writing only one article but several more in the making)

Here is what I have written so far:

If this is not yet enough to convince the responsible persons to add this as religion, then I shall keep this open until more articles were published, but I'd be very happy for some feedback from the official peoples.

Praise be thy Swizzles !

Much love, MCKitkat | Talk - 26.11.2015 23:34 (GMT+1)

-1 No

  • Religions cannot be blatantly similar to Real Life religions and their denominations (Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, etc) to avoid vandalism and offending followers.

- Each Friday, at 20:00 PM, the brothers and sisters of Swift shall come together in their local Churches, play a Taylor Swift song and recite the following prayer: variation of Christian Lords Prayer - poor taste and against rules

  • Religions must take into account copyrights and intellectual property. Religions should be original and not copied directly from literature, video games, television, movies, etc.
  • Any claims of numbers of followers will require sources.
  • Religions that refer to eRepublik players as deities, prophets, saints, etc. must have the consent of those involved in writing to ensure that Erepublik Laws are being observed.
  • Articles about religions, like all wiki articles, must respect the eRepublik Rules (SPAM is against eRepublik Rules).

- ...but we have already 1 article (there used to be 4 but the first articles were deleted due to Spam... --Sre8renica (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2015 (PST)